By The Editor In Chief
The recent claim by Uebert Angel, a prominent Zimbabwean diplomat, that he is the country’s second-in-command after President Emmerson Mnangagwa has caused a stir in political circles. While some may dismiss it as another sensational statement from a self-important figure, it raises serious questions about the state of democracy and leadership in Zimbabwe.
Angel’s claim would mean that he holds a higher position than Vice President Constantino Chiwenga, who played a significant role in the military coup that ousted former President Robert Mugabe in 2017. This is a worrying development, as it suggests that power may not be distributed as it should be in Zimbabwe.
Many political analysts believe that Chiwenga is the de facto leader of the country, with Mnangagwa serving as a mere figurehead. If Angel’s claim is true, it would mean that Zimbabwe is being run by a shadowy group of individuals, with no clear lines of authority or accountability.
Furthermore, Angel’s boastful comments to undercover journalists about his position being created specifically for him by Mnangagwa are deeply troubling. It suggests that the President is more interested in pleasing his inner circle than in promoting transparency and good governance.
The fact that Angel was appointed as a special envoy and ambassador-at-large to Europe and the Americas by Mnangagwa also raises questions about his qualifications and experience. Was he appointed based on merit, or was he given the position as a reward for his loyalty to the ruling party?
These are important questions that need to be answered, especially given the political and economic challenges facing Zimbabwe. The country has been in a state of crisis for years, with high levels of corruption, inflation, and unemployment. It needs leaders who are competent, accountable, and transparent, not those who are more interested in their own personal gain.
Uebert Angel’s claim to be Zimbabwe’s number two is a troubling development that should not be taken lightly. It raises serious questions about the state of leadership and democracy in the country and highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability. Zimbabweans deserve leaders who are focused on serving their interests, not those of a select few.