5 Wasted Years????? “Ramaphosa’s Zimbabwe shortcomings” his lack of action on Zimbabwe that stands out as one of the worst aspects of his presidency
As South Africa marks five years since the election of President Cyril Ramaphosa, it is worth reflecting on his tenure in power. While he may have implemented some positive changes, his position on Zimbabwe has been one of the worst aspects of his presidency.
Ramaphosa has been criticized for his lack of action on the deteriorating situation in Zimbabwe. The country is facing a severe economic crisis, with skyrocketing inflation, a currency collapse, and widespread poverty. The government has been accused of human rights abuses, including arbitrary arrests and torture of political opponents.
Despite these clear violations, Ramaphosa has failed to take any decisive action to hold the Zimbabwean government accountable. His administration has been accused of turning a blind eye to the crisis, despite the fact that it is having a direct impact on South Africa.
This lack of action is in stark contrast to Ramaphosa’s predecessor, Jacob Zuma. While Zuma’s presidency was marred by corruption scandals, he was at least willing to take a strong stance on Zimbabwe. In 2008, he brokered a power-sharing agreement between Zimbabwe’s ruling party and the opposition, which helped to ease tensions and stabilize the country.
Ramaphosa’s failure to follow in Zuma’s footsteps has been a major disappointment for many South Africans. It suggests a lack of leadership and a reluctance to take on tough challenges.
Of course, it is not just Zimbabwe where Ramaphosa has been criticized. His record on corruption, job creation, and social welfare has been mixed, with some notable successes but also some major failures.
However, it is his lack of action on Zimbabwe that stands out as one of the worst aspects of his presidency. As South Africa looks ahead to the next five years, it is vital that the government takes a stronger stance on human rights and democracy in the region. Failure to do so could have disastrous consequences, not just for Zimbabwe, but for the entire continent.